Marvel’s recent track record has been rocky. Once considered the most reliable brand in Hollywood, the studio has been struggling with box office disappointments, audience fatigue, and an identity crisis over its next direction. But in the middle of that slump came an unexpected hit: X-Men ’97. The revival of the beloved 1990s animated series landed with both fans and critics, earning some of the strongest reviews Marvel has received in years. Instead of being embraced as a victory, however, the series became a source of tension — and now a legal battle — between its showrunner, Beau DeMayo, and Marvel itself.
From Fan Favorite to Studio Problem
On paper, X-Men ’97 should have been the easiest win Marvel could imagine. It tapped into nostalgia for one of the most beloved Saturday morning cartoons of the ’90s, expanded its storytelling for a modern audience, and gave long-time fans something that felt emotionally grounded at a time when the MCU’s theatrical output was being criticized as formulaic.
But according to DeMayo, Marvel leadership didn’t view the show as a success to celebrate. In a Twitter thread that quickly spread across entertainment media, DeMayo recounted a phone call with a Marvel executive after Episode 5 premiered. He says he asked if Kevin Feige, the president of Marvel Studios, was happy with the show’s reception. The answer, after a long pause, was that Feige would be “happier” if fans weren’t using X-Men ’97 as a referendum on how to “fix the MCU.”
That single quote reveals the contradiction at the heart of this controversy. The show was being hailed as proof that Marvel could still connect with audiences, but its very success threatened to highlight what wasn’t working elsewhere in the studio’s empire.
The Missed Celebration
DeMayo also pointed out that Feige and Marvel co-president Louis D’Esposito skipped the show’s premiere at the El Capitan Theatre. Their absence wasn’t just symbolic — it sent a message about how Marvel valued the project. There was no public thank-you to fans, no acknowledgment of the original creators from the 1990s, and no celebration of the voice cast who helped make the X-Men cultural icons long before the MCU existed.
For DeMayo, the snub reinforced the sense that leadership viewed X-Men ’97 as a side project — “just a cartoon,” as he put it — rather than as part of the studio’s core brand identity.
The Legal Battle
The dispute goes beyond awkward red carpets and Twitter threads. In September 2024, DeMayo filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court seeking declaratory relief. His complaint alleges that Marvel wrongfully terminated him in March 2024, accused him of misconduct without a fair investigation, and then pressured him into signing a settlement agreement that included a sweeping non-disparagement clause.
According to the complaint, the clause effectively barred DeMayo from speaking about his experiences at Marvel without prior approval — including allegations of harassment and discrimination he says he witnessed or endured. California law restricts such provisions, making them unenforceable if they prevent employees from discussing unlawful workplace conduct. DeMayo argues that Marvel’s agreement violated those protections.
He also claims Marvel used the clause to bar him from attending the Creative Arts Emmys, where X-Men ’97 was nominated for his work. For DeMayo, the non-disparagement clause wasn’t just restrictive — it was a tool to erase him from the show’s public success.
Marvel, for its part, denies all wrongdoing. In its October 2024 response, the company rejected DeMayo’s allegations and filed a laundry list of legal defenses, including claims that his complaint wasn’t ripe for court, that he had already agreed to arbitration, and that he waived his rights when he signed the settlement. The studio is also leaning on California statutes that allow confidentiality around settlement terms, trade secrets, and proprietary information.
The court has already set a schedule: a final status conference in September 2025 and a non-jury trial beginning October 3, 2025.
A Pattern in Hollywood
What makes this conflict so fascinating is how it echoes other moments in Hollywood history where creative success was seen as inconvenient to the corporate hierarchy. Studios often like their hits to fit within an established brand strategy — and when a project succeeds outside that formula, it can feel like a challenge to leadership.
Lucasfilm faced similar dynamics when The Clone Wars animated series earned massive fan loyalty but was often treated as secondary canon until Disney+ made animation more central. Pixar has had films shuffled to streaming releases, undermining their prestige, despite critical acclaim. Even within Marvel itself, projects like What If…? were quietly downplayed compared to splashier live-action titles.
X-Men ’97 hit at the worst possible time for Marvel’s leadership. The MCU was already being criticized for losing its storytelling focus. When fans started using the show as proof of what Marvel should be doing differently, it turned into an uncomfortable spotlight on Feige’s strategy.
The Identity Crisis
At its core, the battle over X-Men ’97 speaks to Marvel’s identity crisis. For over a decade, Kevin Feige was celebrated as the architect of the MCU, the guiding hand behind every major success. But X-Men ’97 thrived without his involvement, reconnecting with fans on story and character alone. That undercut the mythology that Marvel’s wins are always top-down, driven by the studio system rather than individual creatives.
If DeMayo’s allegations are accurate, Marvel leadership responded not by embracing the show’s success but by distancing themselves from it — even to the point of sidelining the very person responsible for its acclaim.
What Comes Next
The lawsuit ensures that some of these disputes will be aired publicly. Whether DeMayo ultimately wins or not, the case puts Marvel’s internal culture under a microscope at a time when the studio can least afford bad optics. The trial is scheduled to overlap with Marvel’s attempts to stabilize Phase 5 of the MCU — a precarious moment that could turn X-Men ’97 from a side controversy into a symbol of the studio’s deeper struggles.
In the meantime, X-Men ’97 continues to stand as a reminder of what fans want from Marvel: focused storytelling, respect for character history, and emotional stakes that don’t require endless crossovers to matter. Whether Marvel learns from that or keeps trying to downplay it may determine the studio’s future.
About the Author
