The Michael Jackson biopic is getting hit with negative reviews, with critics calling it sanitized, bland, and lacking depth.
Reviews from The Hollywood Reporter and The Guardian point to the same issue. The film focuses on Michael Jackson’s music and legacy, but avoids the more difficult and controversial parts of his life.
Why are critics criticizing the Michael Jackson biopic?
Critics say the film lacks balance and avoids complexity.
David Rooney of The Hollywood Reporter writes that the movie works more as a celebration than a story. It recreates iconic performances and moments, but doesn’t fully explore the person behind them.
Peter Bradshaw of The Guardian takes it further, describing the film as stripped down and sanitized. He argues that the biopic avoids a critical perspective and largely sidesteps the controversies tied to Michael Jackson’s life.
The result is a film that shows the image, but not the full reality.
Does the movie address the abuse allegations and controversies?
Not in a meaningful way, according to critics.
The Guardian specifically calls out the omission of the abuse allegations and broader controversies, framing it as a major weakness in the film’s storytelling.
The Hollywood Reporter does not go into those details directly, but still criticizes the film for avoiding the more difficult aspects of Jackson’s life.
Both reviews suggest the same underlying issue. The film avoids the elements that would complicate its narrative.
Can a Michael Jackson biopic work without the controversies?
Yes, but critics say it still needs depth.
A biopic doesn’t have to focus entirely on scandals to be effective. But it does need to show the pressures, contradictions, and defining moments that shaped the person.
The The Jacksons: An American Dream is often cited as an example of that balance. It explored Joe Jackson’s treatment of his children, the pressure placed on Michael at a young age, and moments like the Pepsi burn incident, which became part of a larger pattern of physical and psychological strain later in his life.
Critics argue that this kind of context is largely missing from the new film.
Why isn’t Janet Jackson in the Michael Jackson biopic?
Janet Jackson is not in the film because she chose not to participate.
According to People, La Toya Jackson said Janet was approached about being involved in the project but declined. The filmmakers respected that decision.
There has been no additional explanation given for her absence.
What’s missing from the Michael Jackson biopic?
According to critics, the film is missing perspective.
It presents Michael Jackson as an icon, but doesn’t fully explore the contradictions, pressures, and controversies that defined his life and public image.
That lack of depth is why many reviewers say the film feels incomplete.
Conclusion
The criticism of the Michael Jackson biopic isn’t just about what’s included. It’s about what’s left out.
Without that balance, critics say the film ends up feeling less like a biography and more like a curated version of his legacy.
About the Author
